ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34 N0111

ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG2 N23

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34

Information Technology ---

Document Description and Processing Languages

TITLE: Response to the Final AFII Liaison Statement concerning ISO/IEC 10036
SOURCE: Y. Komachi
PROJECT:
PROJECT EDITOR:
STATUS: Document for SC34 meeting in Philadelphia
ACTION: For information
DATE: 1999-11-29
DISTRIBUTION: SC34 and Liaisons
REFER TO:
REPLY TO: Dr. James David Mason
(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 Chaiman)
SAIC
Information Technology Services
Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant
Bldg. 9113, M.S. 8208
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8208 U.S.A.
Telephone: +1 423 574-6973
Facsimile: +1 423 574-18964
Network: [email protected]
http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/sc34/
ftp://ftp.ornl.gov/pub/sgml/sc34/

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
American National Standards Institute
11 West 42nd Street
New York, NY 10036
Tel: +1 212 642 4976
Fax: +1 212 840 2298
Email: [email protected]


Response to the Final AFII Liaison Statement concerning ISO/IEC 10036

The proposed topic should be discussed in the separate issues: glyph registration and ISO/IEC 10036.

1. Glyph Registration

Being independent of the volume increase in Unicode or ISO/IEC 10646, the concept of glyph and its registration are valid and meaningful. East Asian countries, in particular, have actually a strong requirement for registration of their glyphs.

A trade organization will not surely provide fund for glyph registration. The future registration of glyphs should be carried out as a full volunteer work supported by a semi-automatic procedure.

Instead of AFII or Unicode consortium, such a registration activity could be taken by a Japanese organization which has an interest in glyph registration.

2. ISO/IEC 10036

ISO/IEC 10036 should not be discussed from only the glyph registration's point of view. The standard specifies the registration of objects:

The related standards such as ISO/IEC 9541, ISO/IEC 9070 and ISO/IEC 10180 refer to ISO/IEC 10036. The ISO/IEC 10036 is worth while being in the SC34 standards architecture.

Therefore ISO/IEC 10036 should be confirmed still in the forthcoming periodic review of the standard.