| ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Document Description and Processing Languages Secretariat: Japan (JISC) |
| DOC. TYPE | Summary of Voting/Table of Replies | |||||||
| TITLE | Summary of Voting on ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 961: ISO/IEC CD 9541-4, Information technology -- Font information interchange -- Part 4: Harmonization to Open Font Format | |||||||
| SOURCE | SC 34 Secretariat | |||||||
| PROJECT | 9541-4 | |||||||
| STATUS | Based on the ballot responses, this CD is APPROVED. WG 2 is requested to prepare a disposition of comments report and revised text for further processing. | |||||||
| ACTION ID | FYI | |||||||
| DUE DATE | ||||||||
| DISTRIBUTION | P, O and L Members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 ; ISO/IEC JTC 1 Secretariat; ISO/IEC ITTF | |||||||
| ACCESS LEVEL | Def | |||||||
| ISSUE NO. | 14 | |||||||
| FILE |
|
| ||||||
Secretariat
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 - IPSJ/ITSCJ (Information Processing Society of
Japan/Information Technology Standards Commission of Japan)* Room 308-3,
Kikai-Shinko-Kaikan Bldg., 3-5-8, Shiba-Koen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0011 Japan
*Standard Organization Accredited by JISC
Telephone: +81-3-3431-2808;
Facsimile: +81-3-3431-6493; E-mail: kimura @ itscj.ipsj.or.jp
| Summary of Voting on ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 961 : ISO/IEC CD 9541-4, Information technology -- Font information interchange -- Part 4: Harmonization to Open Font Format | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 : CD | |||||
| Q1 | No response | Comments Reasons | |||
| Approve | Disapprove | Abstention | |||
| P-Member | |||||
| Brazil | X | ||||
| Bulgaria | X | ||||
| Canada | X | ||||
| Chile | X | ||||
| China | X | ||||
| Colombia | X | ||||
| Cote-d'Ivoire | X | ||||
| Cyprus | X | ||||
| Czech Republic | X | ||||
| Denmark | X | ||||
| Egypt | X | ||||
| Finland | X | ||||
| France | X | ||||
| Germany | X | ||||
| India | X | ||||
| Italy | X | ||||
| Japan | X* | ||||
| Kazakhstan | X | ||||
| Kenya | X | ||||
| Korea, Republic of | X | ||||
| Lebanon | X | ||||
| Luxembourg | X | ||||
| Malaysia | X | ||||
| Malta | X | ||||
| Netherlands | X | ||||
| New Zealand | X | ||||
| Norway | X | ||||
| Pakistan | X | ||||
| Poland | X | ||||
| Romania | X | ||||
| South Africa | X | ||||
| Sri Lanka | X | ||||
| Sweden | X | ||||
| Switzerland | X | ||||
| Thailand | X | ||||
| Trinidad and Tobago | X | ||||
| Turkey | X | ||||
| United Kingdom | X | ||||
| USA | X | ||||
| Venezuela | X | ||||
| Total (40) | 13 | 0 | 14 | 13 | |
| *: Approve with comments #: Acceptance of the reasons and appropriate changes in the text will change the vote to approval. | |||||
| Japan |
a) Page 1, if the reference to ISO/IEC 10036 is required, it should be listed
in normative reference.
b) Page 1, in chapter 3, a note should be added to clarify the difference
between "italic" term in ISO/IEC 14496-22 and that in ISO/IEC 9541.
c) Page 13, in chapter 6, "layout tag registry" should refer ISO/IEC 14496-22
5.4.3.1.
d) Page 13, ISO/IEC 10036 provides the graphic data and the glyph index. Some
source of glyphs provide supplementary informations to relate the glyph with the
character, but these informations are out of ISO/IEC 10036. Therefore, the
layout features in ISO/IEC 14496-22 are difficult to associate the ISO/IEC
14496-22 layout feature with ISO/IEC 10036. To refer ISO/IEC 10036, "glyph index
and associated information could help (see ISO/IEC 10036)" may be
reasonable.
e) Page 13, the bibliography is numbered as chapter 7. It should not be
numbered.
f) In all pages, "handle" should be corrected with "deal with".
| Malta |
| Netherlands |
| United Kingdom |