ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34 N256

ISO/IEC logo

 

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34

Information Technology --

Document Description and Processing Languages

 

TITLE:

 

Summary of Voting on SC 34 N 221 - Topic Map Constraint Language to support ISO/IEC 13250

SOURCE:

SC 34 Secretariat

PROJECT:

 

PROJECT EDITOR:

SC 34 / WG 3

STATUS:

 

ACTION:

Based on the voting results, this project is approved. This document is forwarded to WG 3, which is instructed to begin development of this new work item.  The JTC 1 NP number for this project is ISO/IEC 19756

DATE:

 

DISTRIBUTION:

SC34 and Liaisons

REFER TO:

 

REPLY TO:

Dr. James David Mason
(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 Chairman)
Y-12 National Security Complex
Information Technology Services
Bldg. 9113 M.S. 8208
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8208 U.S.A.
Telephone: +1 865 574-6973
Facsimile: +1 865 574-1896
E-mail: mailto:[email protected]
http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/sc34oldhome.htm

Ms. Sara Hafele, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat
American National Standards Institute
25 West 43rd Street
New York, NY 10036
Tel: +1 212 642 4937
Fax: +1 212 840 2298
E-mail: [email protected]

 


 

JTC 1 / SC 34 N 0256

2001-10-04

JTC 1 / SC 34 Voting Summary

N 221 - Proposed NP for Topic Map Constraint Language

Q.1

Do you accept the proposal in document JTC 1 N 183 as a sufficient definition of the new work item? (If you have responded "NO" to the above question, you are required to comment.)

9 of 13 – Yes , 0 of 13 – No ,  0 of 13 – Abstain ,  4 of 13 – No Response

Q.2

Do you support the addition of the new work item to the programme of work of the joint technical committee?

8 of 13 – Yes , 0 of 13 – No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response

Q.3

Do you commit yourself to participate in the development of this new work item?

5 of 13 – Yes , 3 of 13 – No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response

Q.4

Are you able to offer a project editor who will dedicate his/her efforts to the advancement and maintenance of this project? (If "YES," please identify .............................................................)

1 of 13 – Yes , 7 of 13 – No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response

Q.5

Do you have a major contribution or a reference document ready for submittal?

1 of 13 – Yes , 7 of 13 – No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response

Q.6

Will you have such a contribution in ninety days?

1 of 13 – Yes , 7 of 13 – No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response

 

P-Member

Q.1

Q.2

Q.3

Q.4

Q.5

Q.6

Comments

 

Brazil

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada

Y

 

 

 

 

 

 

China

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

 

Denmark

Y

Y

N

N

N

N

 

France

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ireland

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Italy

Y

Y

N

N

N

N

 

Japan

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

 

Republic of  Korea

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Netherlands

Y

Y

N

N

N

N

 

Norway

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

 

United Kingdom

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

See attached

United States

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

 

 

NP Approval Criteria per the JTC 1 Directives

9.3.2           In order to be approved, the NP shall be supported by a majority of all P‑members of JTC 1*  with at least five P‑members of the SC to which the project will be assigned committed to active participation.

 

*Per JTC 1 N 6148, the 60 Day Letter Ballot Concerning Subcommittee Level Approval of NPs was   approved

 

Based on the results of this letter ballot, this NP is APPROVED, and will

be added to the SC 34 Program of Work

 

 

National Body Comments Received

 

United Kingdom

 

The UK has some comments to make on the NW Proposal and the Project Acceptance Criteria.

 

The question about requirements for coding has been answered NO. There is a requirement for the language to be expressed in XML which may be significant in terms of document presentation and the answer to this question should be re-examined.

 

The Technical Status of the proposed project is unclear with both Mature and Prospective Technology questions being answered YES. The UK considers that SC 34 should have a clearer understanding of the status of the technology being standardized.

 

The status of conformance to the proposed standard is unclear. Question D1 indicates that there will be no Conformity Assessment but clause 4 of N226 is entitled Notes on Conformance. The UK considers that this needs clarification.