ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34N0867

ISO/IEC logo

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34

Information Technology --
Document Description and Processing Languages

TITLE: Summary of Voting on JTC 1/SC 34 N 814 - Text for FCD ballot for ISO/IEC 24754: Information technology - Document description and processing languages - Minimum requirements for specifying document rendering systems
SOURCE: SC34 Secretariat
PROJECT: FCD 24754: Information technology - Document description and processing languages - Minimum requirements for specifying document rendering systems
PROJECT EDITOR: Mr. Keisuke Kamimura; Dr. Soon-Bum Lim
STATUS: Summary of voting
ACTION: Based on the ballot responses, this FCD is APPROVED and the project status changes to 40.60. Project Editors are requested to review comments and strongly consider disapproved votes. Please advise the Secretariat regarding (1) the change to status 40.92, 40.93, 40.98 or 40.99, and (2) the next project status and anticipated date that project status will change.
DATE: 2007-07-03
DISTRIBUTION: SC34 and Liaisons
REFER TO: N0814b - 2007-01-22 - Ballot due 2007-05-22 FCD ISO/IEC 24754: Information technology - Document description and processing languages - Minimum requirements for specifying document rendering systems
N0814 - 2007-01-22 - Text for FCD ballot for ISO/IEC 24754: Information technology - Document description and processing languages - Minimum requirements for specifying document rendering systems
REPLY TO:

Dr. James David Mason
(ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Chairman)
Y-12 National Security Complex
Bldg. 9113, M.S. 8208
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8208 U.S.A.
Telephone: +1 865 574-6973
Facsimile: +1 865 574-1896
Network: [email protected]
http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/
ftp://ftp.y12.doe.gov/pub/sgml/sc34/

Mr. G. Ken Holman
(ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat - Standards Council of Canada)
Crane Softwrights Ltd.
Box 266,
Kars, ON K0A-2E0 CANADA
Telephone: +1 613 489-0999
Facsimile: +1 613 489-0995
Network: [email protected]
http://www.jtc1sc34.org



P-Member APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT AS PRESENTED APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT WITH COMMENTS AS GIVEN ON THE ATTACHED DISAPPROVAL OF THE DRAFT FOR REASONS ON THE ATTACHED DISAPPROVAL (appropriate changes in the text will change vote to APPROVAL) ABSTENTION (For Reasons Below) NO RESPONSE
Bulgaria           X
Brazil           X
Canada X          
Switzerland           X
Côte-d'Ivoire           X
China           X
Cyprus           X
Czech Republic   X        
Germany         X  
Denmark         X  
Finland           X
France           X
India           X
Italy X          
Japan   X        
Kenya           X
Korea, Republic of           X
Kazakhstan           X
Netherlands         X  
Norway           X
Sweden           X
Thailand           X
Trinidad and Tobago           X
United Kingdom X          
USA X          
O-member (for comment only)
Romania   X        

Czech Republic

In our opinion if the ISO/IEC 24754 should improve interchange of requirements for document rendering systems then standard should also define XML based interchange syntax for all features defined in the section 4.

Germany

Abstention due lack of expertise.

Japan

An annex (informative) should be added to show some examples of value description.

Netherlands

No experts available.

Romania

5

-

te

New Item concerning macros and office automation.

New Item 5 with the title Automation, where the document rendering system should indicate if it has, or not ,any kind of automation, and, if necessary, describe the language used with basic functionalities.

Foreword

Paragraph 4

ge

Clarify the scope of this document

In the section Foreword, change “... for specifying document rendering systems and document format. “ by “... for specifying document rendering systems The document specification format should have the same minimum requirements described here. “

4.1.14

-

te

The measure unit used should be specified

New sub-item 4.1.14 with the title Metrics, where should be described the measure unit used by the whole document.

4.1.12

Title

ed

-

In the item 4.1.12, replace the title “Font-resourses portability” by “Font-resources portability”